Are Neutrogena Makeup Wipes Chemiclly Safe

Neutrogena customers have filed a class action lawsuit against the beauty company, maxim that a range of Neutrogena cleansing towelette products can crusade burns.

Los Angeles resident Jaimie Potts was attracted to Neutrogena products for their reputation as being prophylactic and healthy for skin while being effective. Based on this agreement, she recounts that she purchased multiple Neutrogena cleansing towelette products for her daughter.

Allegedly, her daughter developed a rash, peeling peel and a burning sensation from using the towelettes, even though she used them correctly.

According to Potts, Neutrogena had misrepresented these products as safe. Particularly, Potts hones in on the exclamation that the company omitted key information that the products can be harmful. She likewise notes that the company went and so far as to deny assertions that the product can cause skin problems.

The Neutrogena facial cleansing wipes class activity lawsuit states Potts was financially injured by Neutrogena.

Allegedly, she relied on the company's representations when making her purchases. She stresses that had she known that the products could harm skin, she would non have purchased them.

According to Potts, many other customers were similarly injured considering they relied on Neutrogena's representations of its products.

The Neutrogena cleansing towelette course action lawsuit then digs into the company'due south various statements that Potts believes are misleading.

She notes that the products are deemed "gentle plenty to use around sensitive heart area, even for contact lens wearers."

Allegedly, the use instructions for the production informs users that "in that location is no need to rinse" with h2o after using the products. Potts says this leads customers to believe the products are "every bit benign as h2o."

Additionally, the company advertises that the products are "opthamologist tested," "dermatologist tested" and "allergy tested," which, according to Potts, gives users the impression the products are approved by these professionals and discovered to be hypoallergenic.

Beyond the statements made directly on the production's label and advertisements, consumers rely on the the reputation of Neutrogena to understand the products as rubber. Potts notes that Neutrogena is known as the "#one Dermatologist recommended skincare brand."

The Neutrogena towelette form action lawsuit states that the visitor not only implies the products are safe, but states this explicitly, saying the products "won't irritate skin."

According to Potts, Neutrogena echoes this statement in a number of means through the product advertisement.

All the same, customer complaints indicate the products do not live upwardly to these advertisements and implications, the class action lawsuit says.

Numerous customers have supposedly come forward to country that they were injured by their use of the towelettes. Potts explains that consumers' complaints well-nigh these products appointment back at to the lowest degree three years, and recount instances of chemical burns, rashes, skin irritation, pare peeling, facial disfigurement and other issues.

Potts argues Neutrogena could have and should have taken action in low-cal of these responses, but has not changed form since producing the products.

She states that the company has not added warnings for the possible adverse effects of the product, nor has the company included warnings about the risks associated with repeated use of the products, even though many consumers study that they used the products repeatedly before having problems with them.

The Neutrogena towelette grade action lawsuit asserts that the company had, at minimum, a duty to inform consumers of the known risks associated with the products. Federal regulations supposedly require companies to provide such warning labels and statements to consumers.

To add together insult to injury, Potts notes Neutrogena pays lip service to the idea of transparency, saying: "We want you lot to feel expert about how we make Neutrogena products. You tin merely exercise that if you have the facts."

Instead, the company chose to omit essential facts, putting profits ahead of its consumers' wellness and financial involvement.

Potts argues that the company was unjustly enriched by the auction of the products.She seeks damages on behalf of herself and a Class of similarly afflicted consumers.

In an update to this legal news, the Neutrogena face wipe injury grade activity lawsuit has been removed to federal courtroom since it was initially filed.

Take yous purchased a skincare product that caused you to take an adverse reaction? Share your experiences in the comments below.

Potts is represented by John J. Nelson of Finkelstein & Krinsk LLP.

The Neutrogena Facial Cleanser Class Action Lawsuit is Jaimie Potts v. Neutrogena Corporation, et al., Example No. 2:xx-cv-06323, in the U.S. Commune Courtroom for the Cardinal District of California.

Please note: Top Course Actions is non a settlement administrator or police force firm. Summit Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on form action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Elevation Grade Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the condition of any form action settlement claim. You lot must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for whatsoever updates regarding your claim status, merits form or questions well-nigh when payments are expected to be mailed out.

Source: https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/consumer-products/beauty-products/neutrogena-class-action-lawsuit-says-cleansing-towelettes-cause-burns/

Posted by: hamiltonwathre.blogspot.com

Share this post